A few years after the complete collapse of everything C. T. Russell had predicted, J. F. Rutherford began a process of replacing Russell’s unfulfilled predictions with a series of invisible and spiritual events associated with the years 1914 and 1918. By the early 1930s the process was complete.
An interesting comment on this transformation was made by Carl Sagan in his book Broca’s Brain (New York: Ballantine Books, 1979, pp. 332-333):
Doctrines that make no predictions are less compelling than those which make correct predictions; they are in turn more successful than doctrines that make false predictions.
But not always. One prominent American religion confidently predicted that the world would end in 1914. Well, 1914 has come and gone, and — while the events of that year were certainly of some importance — the world does not, at least so far as I can see, seem to have ended. There are at least three responses that an organized religion can make in the face of such a failed and fundamental prophecy. They could have said, “Oh, did we say ‘1914’? So sorry, we meant ‘2014.’ A slight error in calculation. Hope you weren’t inconvenienced in any way.” But they did not. They could have said, “Well, the world would have ended, except we prayed very hard and interceded with God so He spared the Earth.” But they did not. Instead, they did something much more ingenious.
They announced that the world had in fact ended in 1914, and if the rest of us hadn’t noticed, that was our lookout. It is astonishing in the face of such transparent evasions that this religion has any adherents at all. But religions are tough. Either they make no contentions which are subject to disproof or they quickly redesign doctrine after disproof. The fact that religions can be so shamelessly dishonest, so contemptuous of the intelligence of their adherents, and still flourish does not speak very well for the tough-mindedness of the believers. But it does indicate, if a demonstration were needed, that near the core of the religious experience is something remarkably resistant to rational inquiry.
One thought on “Carl Sagan’s Remarks About Jehovah’s Witnesses False Prophecies”
“…near the core of the religious experience is something remarkably resistant to rational inquiry.” How true, Carl, how true! It is indeed remarkable that people who may be sensible and judicious in any other facet of life are so willing to completely abandon reason and common sense in matters or religious faith. Jehovah’s Witnesses are certainly not unique in doing so, as it seems to hold true among the deeply devout of most all religious faiths. But it is quite extraordinary that so many of the Witness faithful have stuck with “the organization” through so many doctrinal changes and renditions of “the truth”. I have come to believe that – at least for a great many – it just doesn’t matter how many changes and flip-flops the Society makes. They really don’t care that the Society has never been demonstably right about anything. They love the association and the culture of “the organization” and are perfectly content and happy to just go with the flow. It’s just so much easier not to think too hard about it.